The High Court has dismissed an application for an interim injunction brought by Team Duncan in connection with the 2026 Grenada Football Association (GFA) elections.
The decision was handed down on Saturday morning (9 May) by Honourable Madam Justice Ria Bailey, following a hearing held on 8 May 2026. The application, submitted by Roger Duncan and Trevor McIntosh, sought to halt the Extraordinary General Congress and suspend the GFA Council elections until the Court could fully examine the substantive claim.
Team Duncan argued that a series of alleged inconsistencies and procedural irregularities led to the disqualification of their slate, effectively preventing them from fairly contesting the 9 May elections.
In her ruling, Justice Bailey noted that the concerns raised were not trivial or without basis, and acknowledged that the claim touched on significant issues of fairness, natural justice, and the integrity of the electoral process.
However, the Court ultimately concluded that the balance of convenience did not support granting interim relief.
Key factors considered by the Court included:
- The advanced stage of the electoral process
- The risk of disruption to football governance in Grenada
- Evidence suggesting potential negative consequences under FIFA’s regulatory framework should the elections be halted by court order
- The existence of internal appeal mechanisms within the GFA structure
- The timing of the application, submitted only days before the scheduled vote
Regarding the third point, the Court referenced a letter said to originate from FIFA, warning that the governing body could consider suspending the GFA if the injunction were granted. This evidence was a significant factor in the Court’s assessment.
The Court also took into account submissions from the GFA indicating that Team Duncan had already initiated campaign activities prior to the formal release of the electoral timetable, and that multiple clubs were able to meet endorsement requirements within the designated period.
Justice Bailey stressed that the refusal to grant interim relief does not represent a final ruling on the substantive issues raised. No definitive findings were made on allegations of negligence, breaches of natural justice, standing, or the overall fairness of the electoral process, all of which remain subject to trial.
The application for interim injunctive relief was therefore dismissed, with costs awarded against the Applicants, to be assessed if not agreed.
In response, Team Duncan stated that it respects the Court’s decision and expressed appreciation for its legal team, which it said advocated throughout the process for fairness, transparency, and accountability.
While expressing disappointment, Team Duncan reaffirmed its commitment to the development of football in Grenada and to continued advocacy for strong governance, integrity, and inclusiveness within the sport.